FEATURE ARTICLES
House and Senate Complete Work on Budget Resolutions--Conference
Begins after Spring Recess
Senate Banking Committee Approves Bill That Would Gut CRA
Census Update
Senior Citizens Housing Protection Legislation Introduced
NCDA Seeks Comments from Members on PHA Plan Regulation
HUD News
NCDA Notes
CDBG 25th Anniversary Celebrations and Products Information
Call for Agenda Items for NCDA's 1999 Annual Conference
Federal Register Notices
Job Opportunities
|
HOUSE AND SENATE COMPLETE WORK ON BUDGET RESOLUTIONS-- CONFERENCE
BEGINS AFTER SPRING RECESS
Last week, before adjournment for the Easter/Passover break, both houses
of Congress finished work on their respective budget resolutions. Both
bills are similar in that they adhere to the imposed domestic discretionary
budget caps of the Balanced Budget Agreements, and they reduce function
line 450, which contains the Community Development Block Grant Program
(CDBG), the Economic Development Administration (EDA) and programs from
the Rural Development Administration (RDA), by $3.5 billion. In FY 1999
function line 450 was funded at $8.8 billion, for FY 2000 that line is
proposed at $5.3 billion. The two resolutions differ in the years from
2001-2009. The Senate proposes significant cuts in this line to $2.0 billion
in the out years, whereas the House of Representatives leveled funding
at $5.3 billion through 2009. Still that is a significant cut which would
eliminate community development programs and agencies.
What precipitated these cuts? If you recall, the Balanced Budget Agreement
of 1997 requires mandatory cuts in domestic discretionary of approximately
$26 billion for FY 2000. If programs were to remain at current levels,
the budget caps would need to be raised by at least $20 billion. The Republican-lead
Congress want to increase education spending by $10 billion and increase
defense spending by $10 billion, and, provide a tax cut of $900 billion
over the next ten years.
What about the surplus? The Congressional Budget Office is scheduled
to make an estimate on the level of the surplus and how much of it will
come from social security taxes. Republicans want to reserve all the social
security generated surplus for shoring up the social security system and
perhaps fixes to Medicaid. The remainder of the surplus which would come
from general income tax revenue would be targeted for the $900 billion
tax cut.
During the Senate debate on their resolution, an amendment sponsored
by Senator Jack Reed (RI) was defeated on a procedural vote 49-50. The
procedural vote was to waive the budget act point of order because of the
way the amendment was being paid for, by reducing the amount of the proposed
tax cut. Four Republican Senators, Chaffe (RI), Jeffords (VT), Collins
(ME) and Snowe (ME) joined all 45 Democrats in voting for the amendment.
To waive a point of order requires 60 votes. Although the point of order
was defeated, it shows strong support for the CDBG program.
What happens next? When Congress returns from recess the two resolutions
will be conferenced and then sent to the appropriators. The Appropriations
Committee will determine funding levels for each of the 13 subcommittees.
It will be up to the chairs and the leadership of the subcommittees to
determine program and agency funding levels.
How much time do we have? The full Congress will return on April 12.
The two budget resolutions must be conferenced. The Appropriators will
determine subcommittee funding levels, there is the Memorial Day recess,
July 4 recess, August recess, Labor Day recess, as well as all the other
legislation that is on the docket for FY 1999. We have some time. Last
year the President signed HUD's budget until the middle of September. NCDA
and its partners are still pushing for increases in CDBG and HOME funding.
The letter that was sent to the member in March is still the format we
are using, $5 billion for CDBG and $1.8 billion for HOME.
According to our sources on the appropriations side, budget caps will
have to be increased just to ensure level funding. They believe that the
Republicans had to come out strongly against increases because they want
their tax cut. Our strategy is go for as much as we can get. Perhaps set-asides
will become these two programs saving grace. See our sample letter regarding the caps.
SENATE BANKING COMMITTEE APPROVES BILL THAT WOULD GUT CRA
The Senate Banking Committee approved S. 576, to modernize the financial
services industry which would virtually gut the community reinvestment
act. The House Banking Committee also passed a financial services modernization
bill, HR 10. These two bills are designed to repeal depression-era legislation,
the Bank Holding Company Act and the Glass-Steagall Act which established
barriers between the banking, securities and insurance industries. The
Senate bill, S.576, contains two provisions that would substantially weaken
the Community Reinvestment Act's requirements that financial institutions
extend credit to all parts of the community in which they conduct business,
but lacks an important provision contained in the House version that would
require a bank or thrift to have at least a satisfactory rating to engage
in securities or insurance activities. The provisions are:
-
A safe harbor provision whereby banks and savings institutions that have
received a satisfactory or better rating from federal regulators for the
previous three years and wish to merge or acquire another institution,
would be protected from comments by community groups about the merger or
acquisition. Community groups would have to prove that the rating was less
than satisfactory before their comment would be considered by regulators.
-
An exemption from CRA requirements from banks with assets of $100 million
or less. This provision, offered by Senator Shelby (R-AL) and accepted
by Banking Committee Chairman Phil Gramm (R-TX), would exempt more than
6,000 institutions representing approximately 60 percent of all depositories
and would be particularly damaging in rural areas.
CRA advocates have criticized H.R. 10 for not extending CRA coverage to
insurance companies, securities firms, or other financial institutions
that affiliate with banks or thrifts. The fear is that holding companies
could shift all their assets to affiliates or subsidiaries that are not
covered by CRA. H.R. 10 does attempt to expand CRA somewhat, by extending
its requirements to the ten wholesale financial institutions that are authorized
by the bill, such as Morgan Stanley Dean Whitter and Goldman Sachs.
Senator Gramm believes the Senate bill will reach the floor by mid-May,
although many Democrats oppose any rollback of CRA. The House bill has
been referred to the Commerce Committee which has 60 days to review and
amend. President Clinton has vowed to veto the Senate version of the bill
and any bill that attempts to weaken CRA.
CENSUS UPDATE
CENSUS BUREAU ANNOUNCES TWO-PART STRATEGY FOR 2000 CENSUS
The 2000 census will be conducted using two methods, a traditional head
count and statistical sampling. This approach is partly in response to
the recent Supreme Court ruling that bars using statistical sampling as
means of apportioning seats in the House of Representatives, but could
be used for other purposes. From April 1 to December 31, 1999 the Census
Bureau will use traditional methods to count individuals. Then it will
conduct an accuracy and coverage evaluation, including sampling of 300,000
housing units and regional groupings to generate corrected counts. These
counts can help to determine the allocation of nearly $200 billion in federal
funds, including the tax-empt bond volume cap and the low-income housing
tax credit volume cap.
SENIOR CITIZENS HOUSING PROTECTION LEGISLATION INTRODUCED
In response to the outcry being heard around the nation from concerned
senior citizens and their advocates regarding the affect expiring Section
8 contracts will have on senior citizens, three House legislators have
introduced a bill to provide more protection to senior citizens in this
area. Introduced by representatives Leach (R-AI), Lazio (R-NY),
and Walsh (R-NY) on March 26, H.R. 1336 -- The Emergency Residents Protection
Act of 1999 -- mandates that seniors and persons with disabilities who
reside in projects with expiring contracts be provided flexible rental
assistance to allow them to remain in their units. The legislation
targets nonprofit-sponsored housing built before 1990. It is estimated
that more than a quarter million seniors are threatened with expiring contracts.
HUD NEWS
CPD ASSISTANT SECRETARY COOPER ACKNOWLEDGES THAT SOME OF THE PROBLEM
WITH DRAW-DOWN RATES IS DUE TO GRANTEES RECEIVING THEIR ALLOCATIONS LATE
FROM HUD
In discussions with public interest groups, Assistant Secretary Cardell
Cooper acknowledged that at least part of the problem in some communities
is due to HUD not getting letters of credit available to grantees. As you
may know, Assistant Secretary Cooper sent approximately 300 letters to
the chief elected officials of communities whose draw-down rate exceeded
the 1.0/1.5 ratio prescribed in the regulations. NCDA and others have approached
HUD for funding to conduct at least two workshops for communities to help
them improve their draw-down rates. NCDA staff are aware, after polling
many of its members, that there are any number of reasons a community might
have that would slow down their rate of expenditure. We have elected to
look at the situation from a "chronic offender" perspective. If we are
funded we intend to employ NCDA members with outstanding draw-down rates
as instructors to help those communities with improving their rates. NCDA
will keep the membership informed with our progress.
NCDA SEEKS COMMENTS FROM MEMBERS ON PHA PLAN REGULATION
On February 18, HUD released an interim rule which implements the requirement
for a Public Housing Agency five-year and annual plans. The rule was issued
in response to public housing reform legislation that was enacted by Congress
in October 1998 (The Quality Housing and Work Responsibility Act of 1998).
The legislation required PHAs, for the first time, to develop five-year
and annual plans describing their mission, goals, operations, and resources.
The rule outlines the time line and process for completion of a PHA five-year
and annual plan. The rule also requires that the PHA annual plan must be
consistent with its jurisdiction's Consolidated Plan. Specifically, the
Annual Plan must contain a certification by the local official that the
plan is consistent with the Consolidated Plan and provide a description
of the manner in which the plan is consistent. NCDA is seeking comments
from its members on what constitutes "consistency;" how do members define
"consistency" between the PHA annual plan and the consolidated plan. The
rule also seeks comments from local governments on combining the five-year
and annual plan with the submission of the consolidated plan, either in
whole or in part. Please call Vicki Watson at 202-293-7587 by April 16
with your comments on these two points. NCDA would like to submit a letter
to HUD by the April 19 submission date.
NCDA NOTES
CDBG 25th ANNIVERSARY/NATIONAL CD WEEK PRODUCTS INFORMATION
Attached to the Washington Report is an updated flyer on the products
available to assist communities with their celebrations of the 25th
anniversary of the CDBG program. Please note that 25TH ANNIVERSARY
LOGO STICKERS ARE NOW AVAILABLE for purchase at the cost of $100 for
a roll of 1,000 stickers.
GET YOUR ORDERS IN NOW!!!!
NCDA has depleted its supply of CDBG postcards and have very few posters
available. If you are still considering posters and post cards, please
get your orders in soon. T-shirts, hats, mugs, sweat-shirts, tote-bags
and puzzles are still available. It will take approximately 10 days to
receive products.
PLEASE SEND US YOUR CD WEEK/CDBG 25th ANNIVERSARY ACTION PLANS
We have been asked by HUD to help them make decisions
on getting personnel to your events. If you have already made plans, please
let NCDA staff know and perhaps we can facilitate a key HUD speaker at
your event.
NCDA ASKS MEMBERS FOR HOME PROGRAM TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE NEEDS
In an effort to better serve its membership, NCDA has prepared a one-page
survey on the HOME program. The survey is intended to gather feedback from
members on their HOME TA needs and administration of the HOME program.
If you administer the HOME program, please complete the survey and return
it to Vicki Watson by April 15, 1999.
NCDA TECHNOLOGY NEWS
NCDAonline UPDATE!!!
If you have not logged on to NCDAonline.org with your permanent
passwords, you will not be able to log on to the member only section
of the website. Please contact Chandra Western at NCDA or e-mail
her at chandra@ncdaonline.org.
She will provide you with the information necessary to get into
the "Members Only" section as well as how to personalize and make permanent
your passwords and user ID. NCDA staff have discovered that members
are not personalizing their passwords, they continue to use the temporary
passwords to get to the members only section.
PLEASE CONTACT Chandra Western TO LEARN HOW TO GET YOUR PERMANENT
PASSWORDS.
In response to your requests NCDAonline.org has been enhanced. As
part of these ongoing enhancements, we will eventually discontinue the
PAL system. We hope you will let us know what you think of the improvements
and offer suggestions for further enhancements.
There is also some confusion on entering in e-mail addresses directly
online. Once you are in the members only section, click on the appropriate
e-mail link and type in your name in the "subject" area. In the e-mail
message area, type in "subscribe memberlist" and your e-mail address. Don't
forget to put a space between memberlist and your e-mail address. This
should get you on the listserv.
|
Job
Opportunities
Continuum of Care Survey Results
Housing Committee Minutes
Membership Committee Minutes
Community Development Committee Minutes
Back
to the Archives
Back
to Front Page
|